Who leads the institute?
The institute is led by its director, with staff supporting research development, communications, policy review, legal oversight, and administrative continuity.
An official website of the Commonwealth Research Institute
Here's how you know
Official institute websites use commonwealthri.org
Pages published on this domain belong to the Commonwealth Research Institute and are maintained for research, education, and public reference.
Official institute communications use verified channels
Institute notices are issued through this website and from email addresses ending in @commonwealthri.org. Share correspondence only through official institute channels.
Site Navigation
Access research, publications, institute information, and public resources.
Leadership and staff supporting independent educational technology research at Commonwealth Research Institute.
This page identifies institute leadership, staff responsibilities, and the operational roles that support research, publication, and public communication.
The institute is led by its director, with staff supporting research development, communications, policy review, legal oversight, and administrative continuity.
This page identifies leadership, staff responsibilities, and governance contact so readers can understand who supports the institute’s research, publication, and public communication work.

Robert Vendel, Ed.D., serves as director of CRI in Virginia, overseeing research direction, publication framing, and broader institutional coordination.
Director profile
Director
Institutional role
Leads research direction, publication standards, and institutional planning.
Research focus
Educational technology systems, institutional analysis, policy design, and digital learning implementation.
Education
Ed.D.
Staff
Institute work is supported by staff across research, communications, policy, and operational functions.
Current staff member
Role
Deputy Director
Institutional area
Leadership and operations
Current contribution
Supports institute coordination, internal planning, and continuity of leadership priorities across research, publication, and EdTech program development.
Board of Directors
The board supports the institute through governance, institutional oversight, and long-range continuity across its public and organizational work.
Governance correspondence is intended for formal institutional matters rather than routine research, press, or support inquiries.
Governance and oversight
Board correspondence may be directed here for governance-related questions, institutional matters, or formal communication intended for board review.
Contact
BOARD CORRESPONDENCEResearch direction
The institute’s work is carried through a combination of leadership, staff support, and research-focused roles. Study areas include K-12 digital systems, higher education platforms, workforce technology, governance, institutional performance, procurement, privacy, and digital participation.
The aim is to build a coherent long-range body of analysis rather than a stream of commentary, with emphasis on method, measurable results, and informed understanding of educational technology.
The People page is meant to clarify who directs the work, which staff functions sustain it, and where institutional or governance-related communication should go.
Current contributions
Leads the institute’s research framing, editorial standards, and long-range focus on educational technology, implementation, and measurable outcomes.
Develops comparative work on K-12 digital learning, postsecondary platforms, workforce technology, and policy variation across governance environments.
Advances structured approaches for platform data analysis, case-based review, mixed-method design, and public communication of findings.
Research focus
Research on measurable platform use, course participation, completion, persistence, and long-range implementation performance.
Evaluation of how policy decisions influence digital learning systems, governance, and measurable technology outcomes.
Use of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research to interpret EdTech data with clarity and rigor.
Areas of inquiry
Comparative study of LMS deployment, classroom tools, device access, and digital implementation design across public school systems.
Research on completion rates, persistence, advising tools, online student support, and measurable outcomes across colleges and universities.
Analysis of digital training pathways, credential value, workforce preparation, and program effectiveness.
Evaluation of EdTech policy, governance, procurement design, privacy oversight, and implementation conditions.
Institute functions
Projects are shaped through structured review, comparative framing, source evaluation, and continued refinement before publication across EdTech subject areas.
Institute work is prepared for public release through careful formatting, communications review, and publication coordination for EdTech-facing outputs.
Administrative, legal, and operational support helps maintain continuity across research, governance, and public presentation.
Ongoing focus
Ongoing work includes comparative research on state and territorial systems, methodological frameworks for structured analysis, and review of policy, governance, finance, and performance questions across education.
As the institute grows, this section can expand to include additional contributors or affiliated researchers. At present, it is intended to present the institute through the director’s profile, research agenda, and active lines of inquiry.
Careers
The institute’s work depends on research, communications, policy, legal, and administrative support. The careers page outlines the kinds of roles that align with the institute’s standards and long-range direction.